11/23/2010

HARRY POTTER 7 - THE MOST BEAUTIFUL POTTER MOVIE



Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 was brilliantly made. As much as I hate the fact that I have to wait SIX bloody months for Part 2 to come out, I would almost say the wait is worth it.

You can clearly tell that Warner Bros., David Yates, and the cast/crew went all out for the finale. CGI was perfect, acting improved immensely, and Hermione looked great. I do agree with many of the audiences that the movie was extremely slow - but at the same time, so was the book. Regardless of how slow the movie was, the scenes were so beautifully filmed that I was too busy admiring the cinematography (and Hermione). Although many of the scenes were altered, and although I did not agree with some of the changes, this was arguably the most faithful adaptation to the book.

I must say this though: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 is NOT FOR CHILDREN! There were some major creepy scenes (and I’m talking about like Paranormal Activity creepy) and so many scenes had suspense that my a** crack started getting sweaty. So parents, please, HIDE YO KIDS.

11/12/2010

DONE! (FOR THE WEEKEND)


I am the happiest architecture student today. Not only did we finally just finish our Biomimicry Project, but the final review went so smoothly. Everyone has been complimenting our studio for our outstanding work; many of them were shocked to hear that we were only 1st year students. I’m so proud of my studio, professor, and myself, too, given that I had absolutely nothing just a week ago and facing mental breakdowns lol.

Too bad this type of awesomeness only happens like 1 out 6394529 times of our studio life…

Detailed pictures + description will be posted on Sunday! As for now, I’m going to enjoy my first weekend without studio work.

12/09/2009

YOU WERE WARNED: 2012 IS CRAP

2012: A Modern-Day Noah’s Ark Hits the Iceberg
BY D. JASON NAM


This is it. This is the epic film where Ronald Emmerich ran out of disaster ideas and thus decided to completely sabotage the world i n 2012. First he had aliens blow up the White House, then he had Godzilla crumble over New York City, and then he flooded and froze half of the world. He desperately tried to layoff his disaster-craze a bit with 10,000 B.C. – a prehistoric love story, which unfortunately ended up being 10,000 times boring.

Quickly learning from his disastrous mistake, Emmerich went back to what he does best: obliterating the world. Loosely basing off of the Mayan’s apocalypse prediction on 12/21/2012, Emmerich took this one small fact, added a whole bunch of the ingredient known as bullshit, and voilĂ ! He cooked up a blockbuster film.

2012 begins the story from 2009, when all the planets in our solar system line up and the sun suddenly goes nuts. Due to the unprecedented amount of neutrinos from a massive solar flare, the Earth’s inner core quickly heats up to the point where the Earth’s crust is shifting. You would figure everyone in the world would know that their world is approaching apocalypse, but no – there is a catch – the government has been keeping this crucial information to themselves. In fact, a very few elite groups of people including the United States president knew about this upcoming phenomenon way earlier and goes around killing those that try to warn the people (so that’s why Billy Mays died!).

Then we meet our “hero” of the movie – Jackson Curtis (John Cusack). Not only is he a struggling writer that drives a limo for a Russian macho as a part-time job, but he also happens to be a struggling father and husband. He is divorced from a hot ex-wife (Amanda Peet) with two kids who don’t quite appreciate him as a family member. In his attempt to earn his love back from his family, he takes the kids out for a camping trip to the Yellow Stone National Park; only to find out that his favorite lake has completely vanished! That’s when the story finally begins to gradually roll. Jackson meets a totally gone nuts dude who eventually becomes his hook-up to all the government’s secrets about the Doomsday, and Adrian Helmsley (Chiwetel Ejiofor), an American geologist hero, without whom the government would have no clue of the Doomsday. The End. Well, not really, but it’s pretty much the end in terms of the plot. From here on, it’s a whole bunch of earthquakes, explosions, more earthquakes, tsunamis, even more explosions, and – you get the point.

Staying loyal to his previous disaster flicks, Emmerich includes a few “emotional” scenes in his attempt to add some soul into the movie. The only problem is that these so-called emotional scenes end up conjuring laughter from the audience because it is so un-strategically placed. But after all, we can’t hate on the movie too much because it never told us to expect some major drama. So in terms of the question: does the movie deliver what it promised? The answer is yes, it did. Just as advertised, Emmerich successfully wiped out 90 percent of the entire world using state-of-art visual effects.

But still – I was hoping Emmerich would’ve learned from his past super-budgeted flops that big booms are simply not enough to make a movie great. And I was really hoping he would especially take a second look at the script, because by this time, we already know that his special effects are going to be excellent. Thus, this movie does not feel new. We have seen big explosions from Independence Day. We have seen big tsunami waves from The Day After Tomorrow. Emmerich basically gives us a brand new Ferrari with used engines and a little note that reads, “Fuck you” on the trunk.

So let’s try to wrap this up. Is 2012 a good Ronald Emmerich film? Yes. Is 2012 a good Ronald Emmerich film? Hell no. The special effects were pleasing to the eyes but just like this summer’s Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, the “Ooh, ahh” effect dies off as it approaches the second half (like that feeling you get after overstuffing yourself at the Chinese buffet). Along with Emmerich’s last three flicks, 2012 will just go down the drain hole and only be remembered as an easy to like but easier to hate epic.

11/13/2009

THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA OPENING SCENE

The Devil Wears Prada (2006)

The opening scene for The Devil Wears Prada sets the tone for the film just right - it's all about women and their all about their fashion. However, it does not fail to maintain the short attention span of the boyfriend that was dragged to the theater. While the girlfriend stares at all the clothes and makeup process of different women, the boyfriend can admire the actual process of women putting on clothes (I know, what a perv).

Director David Frankel does an impressive job by showing what kind of a person Andrea (Anne Hathaway) is by contrasting her daily procedure of how she prepares for the day with other different women. By the end of the scene, the audience has already made a connection with Andrea and have an understanding of who she is as she takes the taxi to her job interview.

At the interview for Runway fashion magazine, the set is perfectly set up, the scripts are cleverly written, and the acting is finely polished that viewers can get a taste of the fashion world.

10/26/2009

SEX



--> It's sad to see how far the advertisement companies have to take the level of sex appeal to grab people's attention. And what's even sadder to see is how it actually works on us.
Not gonna lie over here - I don't mind seeing some beautiful ladies like Victoria Beckham or Eva Mendes while I look through a magazine or drive around the city. But what disturbs me about these two ads is how they are portrayed.

1. Intimately Beckham 
Intimate my ass. If that is the definition of intimacy, I'm outta here. Okay, I understand that David Beckham is the super globally famous soccer stud, but why is only her back shown? Girl, you need to voice your opinion and be like "I WANT MY FACE TO BE SHOWN!” And what's up with David creeping his hand up insider her dress? This print advertisement has SEXISM written all over the place! It's basically saying, all you single ladies out there put some of that Intimately perfume and POOF, you'll find yourself a nice looking British boy. And for y'all dudes out there, you'll get a skinny, submissive girl once you sprinkle some Intimately on yourself. This is not the first case where the male figure dominates the female. Same goes with Axe commercials where whole bunch of hot girls stick to a guy because he smells good. Do most guys really smell that bad that simply smelling nice would attract people? Why is it always the women being submissive? What is that saying about the role of women today? Victoria’s going “oh, David, I love you so much” and all David does is go “Yeah, mate, who’s your daddy now?” with his awkward grin.


2. Secret Obsession
My instant reaction to this advertisement was “What about the kids?” No wonder kids these days are so… inappropriate! Back when I was young, going out in middle school was holding hands and hugging; but now look at the kids today making babies and all that. At least ads in magazines are somewhat controllable by parents, but this ad is a freaking huge billboard! And may I just say Eva, you have a nice body, but you don’t need to strip butt naked for everyone just to promote a fragrance. It seems like our world today is so used to raunchy, half-naked people giving us the I-want-you-look that the only way to catch our attention is, well, fully naked people giving us the I-want-you-look.
I have this picture pop in my head with the advertisers going,
A: “Hmm, we need to step it up with the whole sex appeal for this one. Last one with Megan Fox and her bikini didn’t fly so well.”
B: “Well, I think the only option is to go naked.” 

Next thing you know there won’t even be a hand covering the breasts. That’s when I’ll know the world is coming to an end.

P.S. I hope my title "SEX" didn't startle you - I was just trying to get some attention.